风险仪表板

交易前先算好风险。

仓位大小、爆仓风险和复利增长。无需登录。

仓位大小

你的风险对应多少手?

手数
2.00
$ 风险
1000.00
止损距离
0.004999999999999893
实际风险 %
1.00%

大小按经纪商最小步长(0.01 手)向下取整。小账户或紧止损可能返回 0.00——加余额或放宽止损。

爆仓风险(蒙特卡洛)

5,000 次模拟

每笔 Edge
$650.00
期望值
+0.65R
盈利因子
2.00
保本胜率
33.3%
达到目标的概率
100.0%
平均 18 笔
爆仓概率
0.0%
达到目标前
仍在交易概率
0.0%
既未达到目标也未爆仓
最终余额分布(300 笔交易后)
P10
$262,000
P25
$277,000
P50
$295,000
P75
$313,000
P90
$328,000
每次模拟的平均最大回撤: 4.7%

复利增长

55% win · 1.5R:R · 1%/op

12 个月后(240 笔交易)
$246,154
盈利
+146.2%

几何复利曲线:每笔交易按 (1 + 每笔收益 + 噪声) 倍数累乘余额。 每笔 Edge 为 0.38R、风险 1% 时,每笔预期收益为 每笔预期收益 0.38%. 方差注入 ±20%,让曲线看起来像真实的净值(而非直线)。

确定性计算(相同输入 → 相同结果)。蒙特卡洛默认跑 5,000 次模拟。由 EV Trading Labs 用 ❤️ 制作。

What risk of ruin actually measures

Risk of ruin is the probability that a losing streak wipes your account before your edge has time to show up. It depends on four things: how often you win, how much you win when you do, how much of the account you risk per trade, and how many trades you plan to take. Change any one of them and the number moves — usually more violently than traders expect.

The calculator above runs 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations of your next N trades rather than an analytic formula. The difference matters: a formula gives you the probability of eventual ruin over infinite trades, while the simulation answers the question you actually have, which is whether this account survives the next 200 trades and reaches your target first. It also reports the average maximum drawdown along the way, which is the number that ends most funded-account attempts.

The result is deterministic. The pseudo-random generator is seeded from your inputs, so reloading the page does not shuffle the answer — only changing an input does. That makes it usable for comparing two plans side by side.

How to read the output

P(reach target)
How often the simulation hit your profit goal before ruin. Below 50% means the plan is a coin flip at best.
P(ruin)
How often the account was destroyed first. Anything above a few percent is a plan you would not want to run twice.
Expectancy
Average result per trade in R. If it is negative, no amount of position sizing saves the system — it only decides how fast you lose.
Breakeven win rate
The win rate your reward-to-risk ratio requires just to stay flat. Compare it against your real win rate, not your hoped-for one.
Average max drawdown
The typical worst stretch across simulations. Prop-firm rules are usually broken by this number, not by the final result.

Frequently asked questions

What is risk of ruin in trading?

It is the probability that a run of losses reduces your account below a level you cannot recover from, before your strategy's edge has had time to play out. It combines win rate, reward-to-risk, risk per trade and number of trades into a single probability. A system with a positive expectancy can still have an uncomfortable risk of ruin if the position size is too large.

How is risk of ruin calculated here?

By simulation, not by a closed-form formula: 5,000 Monte Carlo runs of your next N trades, each drawing wins and losses from your stated win rate and reward-to-risk ratio. That captures the path an equity curve actually takes, including the order in which losses arrive, which a formula averages away. The generator is deterministic, so the same inputs always produce the same result.

What is an acceptable risk of ruin?

There is no universal threshold, but the practical rule most professional risk frameworks land on is that ruin probability should be low enough to be irrelevant to the decision — typically well under 1% over your planned trade horizon. If your figure sits in double digits, the usual fix is reducing risk per trade, not finding a better entry.

How much should I risk per trade?

Enough that a normal losing streak is survivable and boring. Run the calculator with your real win rate at 1%, 2% and 5% risk per trade and compare the ruin probability and the average maximum drawdown: the jump between them is far larger than most traders assume, which is why 1-2% is the conventional answer rather than an arbitrary one.

Does compounding change my risk of ruin?

Yes, in both directions. Risking a fixed percentage of a growing balance increases absolute position size as you win and reduces it as you lose, which lowers ruin probability compared with a fixed lot size but also lengthens recovery from a drawdown. The compounding calculator above projects the geometric curve so you can see both effects.

Related free tools

加入 Discord通过 WhatsApp 联系